Filed: May 08, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: REVISED May 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-40818 Fif h Circuit FILED Summary Calendar May 4, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. RAMON RESENDEZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Ramon Gonzales Resendez, also known as Ramon Gonzalez Resendez, also known as Ramon Rezendez Gonzalez, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15
Summary: REVISED May 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-40818 Fif h Circuit FILED Summary Calendar May 4, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. RAMON RESENDEZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Ramon Gonzales Resendez, also known as Ramon Gonzalez Resendez, also known as Ramon Rezendez Gonzalez, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-..
More
REVISED May 8, 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
No. 16-40818
Fif h Circuit
FILED
Summary Calendar May 4, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
RAMON RESENDEZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Ramon Gonzales
Resendez, also known as Ramon Gonzalez Resendez, also known as Ramon
Rezendez Gonzalez,
Defendant - Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:15-CR-25-1
Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Resendez-
Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 16-40818
with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Resendez-Gonzalez has filed a response. We
have reviewed counsel’s brief, Resendez-Gonzalez’s response, and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment
that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2