Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Marshall, 05-30243 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-30243 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 27, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 27, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30243 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC JOSEPH MARSHALL, also known as Slim, also known as John Doe, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (2:03-CR-157-3) - Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The F
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 March 27, 2006

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                           No. 05-30243
                         Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC JOSEPH MARSHALL, also known as Slim,
also known as John Doe,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                          (2:03-CR-157-3)
                       --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Joseph

Marshall has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 744 (1967).     Our independent

review of the brief, Marshall’s response, and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.       Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.   Marshall’s “Motion for Withdrawal of Anders

Brief and Appellate Counsel” is DENIED.




                                  2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer