Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jones, 05-30685 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-30685 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 17, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 17, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30685 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LIONEL JONES, also known as Low Down, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:04-CR-134 - Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public D
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 March 17, 2006

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                 Clerk
                            No. 05-30685
                          Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LIONEL JONES,
also known as Low Down,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
              for the Middle District of Louisiana
                      USDC No. 3:04-CR-134
                      --------------------

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed for Lionel Jones has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Our review of

counsel’s brief, Jones’s response, and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal.   We decline to consider Jones’s

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in this direct appeal,

without prejudice to Jones’s right to assert such claim in a

motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.   See United States v.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                              O R D E R
                            No. 04-51169
                                 -2-

Navejar, 
963 F.2d 732
, 735 (5th Cir. 1992).   Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer