Filed: Mar. 17, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 17, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30685 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LIONEL JONES, also known as Low Down, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:04-CR-134 - Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public D
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 17, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30685 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LIONEL JONES, also known as Low Down, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:04-CR-134 - Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public De..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT March 17, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-30685
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LIONEL JONES,
also known as Low Down,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
USDC No. 3:04-CR-134
--------------------
Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed for Lionel Jones has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our review of
counsel’s brief, Jones’s response, and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We decline to consider Jones’s
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in this direct appeal,
without prejudice to Jones’s right to assert such claim in a
motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
O R D E R
No. 04-51169
-2-
Navejar,
963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.