Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gabriel Renteria-Bear, 16-41580 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 16-41580 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-41580 Document: 00514114540 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-41580 FILED Summary Calendar August 14, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GABRIEL RENTERIA-BEAR, also known as Gabriel Renteria-Vear, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1091-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JO
More
Case: 16-41580 Document: 00514114540 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-41580 FILED Summary Calendar August 14, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GABRIEL RENTERIA-BEAR, also known as Gabriel Renteria-Vear, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-1091-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gabriel Renteria-Bear pleaded guilty to being found in the United States after a previous deportation. At sentencing, the district court agreed to recommend that Renteria-Bear be housed in a facility offering job training; that recommendation was not contained in the written judgment. Thus, Renteria-Bear requests remand pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 so that the district court can correct the written judgment to * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-41580 Document: 00514114540 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2017 No. 16-41580 reflect the oral recommendation. The Government concedes that the judgment should be modified to correct the error. Accordingly, we affirm and remand to the district court for correction of the clerical error. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 36. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED with instruction. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer