Filed: Sep. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-20003 Document: 00514173490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-20003 FILED September 27, 2017 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FAREED BAREFIELD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-267-1 Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: Case: 17-20003 Document: 00514173490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-20003 FILED September 27, 2017 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FAREED BAREFIELD, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-267-1 Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
Case: 17-20003 Document: 00514173490 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 17-20003 FILED
September 27, 2017
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FAREED BAREFIELD,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:15-CR-267-1
Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Fareed Barefield has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Barefield has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant parts of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-20003 Document: 00514173490 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/27/2017
No. 17-20003
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2