Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hector Rea-Ponce, 17-10016 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 17-10016 Visitors: 41
Filed: Nov. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-10016 Document: 00514233066 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-10016 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar November 10, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HECTOR ARTURO REA-PONCE, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:16-CR-193-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. P
More
     Case: 17-10016      Document: 00514233066        Page: 1     Date Filed: 11/10/2017




          IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                   FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals

                                   No. 17-10016
                                                                                     Fifth Circuit

                                                                                   FILED
                                 Summary Calendar                          November 10, 2017
                                                                              Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                   Clerk


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

HECTOR ARTURO REA-PONCE,

                                                Defendant−Appellant.




                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                                No. 3:16-CR-193-1




Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

      Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Hector Rea-Ponce raises an



      * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-10016   Document: 00514233066    Page: 2   Date Filed: 11/10/2017


                               No. 17-10016

argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a sentence
under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. Accord-
ingly, the government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is
GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file its brief is
DENIED as unnecessary, and the judgment is AFFIRMED.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer