Filed: Apr. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50410 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IVY LEE GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-114-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represe
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50410 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IVY LEE GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-114-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represen..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-50410
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
IVY LEE GREEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:04-CR-114-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Ivy Lee Green has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Green’s response shows
that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.