Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Martinez, 05-50600 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-50600 Visitors: 30
Filed: Apr. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50600 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE SAUL MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-2304-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to repres
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   April 12, 2006

                                                             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk
                              No. 05-50600
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SAUL MARTINEZ,

                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                       USDC No. 3:04-CR-2304-ALL
                          --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Jose Saul Martinez on appeal

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Martinez has not

filed a response.     Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.       Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer