Case: 17-50184      Document: 00514476473         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/17/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                          United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                   Fifth Circuit

                                                                                 FILED
                                    No. 17-50184                             May 17, 2018
                                  Summary Calendar
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

TAWUAN STEWART, also known as Gator,

                                                 Defendant–Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:16-CR-68-19


Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       Tawuan Stewart appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea
conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine.                         He
contends that the district court clearly erred in finding that he was accountable
for .5 ounce of cocaine case. Because Stewart objected to the district court’s
finding in the district court, this court reviews the finding for clear error. See
United States v. Gomez-Alvarez, 

, 791 (5th Cir. 2015). The district


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-50184    Document: 00514476473     Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/17/2018


                                 No. 17-50184

court’s calculation of the drug quantity involved in an offense is a factual
finding that is entitled to considerable deference. United States v. Betancourt,

, 246 (5th Cir. 2005). “A factual finding is not clearly erroneous
as long as it is plausible in light of the record as a whole.” 

marks and citation omitted).
      The district court did not clearly err in finding that Stewart was
responsible for the .5 ounce of cocaine base. See 

Report
(PSR) provided that the drug quantity attributable to Stewart was based on
information obtained from a case agent which the agent obtained from
intercepted cellular telephone communications between Stewart and his
codefendant, Elias Mendoza, between July 7, 2015, and September 3, 2015.
The PSR identified each telephone conversation by date and by a specific
number, listed the amount of drugs involved in each telephone conversation,
and provided that Stewart was responsible for a total of 10.5 ounces of powder
cocaine and at least .5 ounce of cocaine base. At the sentencing hearing, the
Government stated that the probation officer’s assessment of .5 ounce of
cocaine base was based on the telephone conversation that took place on July
30th. The Government stated that it had a witness at the sentencing hearing
who could testify concerning this telephone conversation and confirmed that
the telephone conversation was recorded. Stewart’s counsel did not present
any rebuttal evidence but argued that Stewart did not intentionally deal in
cocaine base.
      The PSR had sufficient indicia of reliability to be considered as evidence
by a sentencing judge because it was based on information that a case agent
obtained from recorded cellular telephone conversations between Stewart and
Mendoza. See 

. Stewart had the burden to
prove that the information concerning the disputed drug quantity was



                                       2
    Case: 17-50184     Document: 00514476473     Page: 3   Date Filed: 05/17/2018


                                  No. 17-50184

“materially untrue, inaccurate or unreliable.” United States v. Harris, 

, 230 (5th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
Because he did not present any evidence to show that the evidence in the PSR
was unreliable, the district court was entitled to adopt the facts contained in
the PSR without further inquiry. See 

district court did not err
in holding that for sentencing purposes the Government was not required to
prove that Stewart knew that the offense involved cocaine base in addition to
powder cocaine. See United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 

, 700 (5th
Cir. 2003); see also United States v. Betancourt, 

, 308-09 (5th Cir.
2009). The district court’s finding that Stewart was responsible for the .5 ounce
of cocaine base was “plausible in light of the record as a whole.” See 

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
      AFFIRMED.




                                        3