United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT May 9, 2006 _______________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10198 _______________________ JOHN H. CARNEY; JAMES R. FISHER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ET AL., Defendants, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, One or more unknown officials of the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation; FRED TEED; ROLF D. COBURN, also known as Rolf Nordstrom; KAREN BRUTON; KEN KLEIN; RICHARD RICCABONO; VINCENT G. FAZZIO; JENNIFER GANT; BRAD LAMBERT; RICHARD H. KAMP; PAMELA I. DEMPSEY; JACK HINTON; EDWARD KRAMER, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:99-CV-1989-M ________________________________________________________________ Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court, having carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and pertinent portions of the record in light of the parties’ oral arguments, concludes there is no reversible error in the district court’s essential findings of fact and conclusions of law. We * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. therefore AFFIRM the final judgment of the district court essentially for the reasons stated in its controlling opinions. AFFIRMED. 2