Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-41028 Document: 00514489211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41028 May 29, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PABLO ASTUDILLO-JIMENEZ, Also Known as Juanillo, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 4:16-CR-9-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, C
Summary: Case: 17-41028 Document: 00514489211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41028 May 29, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PABLO ASTUDILLO-JIMENEZ, Also Known as Juanillo, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 4:16-CR-9-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Ci..
More
Case: 17-41028 Document: 00514489211 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/29/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 17-41028 May 29, 2018
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
PABLO ASTUDILLO-JIMENEZ, Also Known as Juanillo,
Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
No. 4:16-CR-9-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Pablo Astudillo-Jimenez has moved
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-41028 Document: 00514489211 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/29/2018
No. 17-41028
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Astudillo-
Jimenez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2