Filed: May 31, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-20192 Document: 00514494184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-20192 FILED May 31, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce DONNA K. HILTON, Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. STEVE MCCRAW, Director of Texas Department of Public Safety; ROBERT EARL PETTY, Individually; CHARLES ANTHONY RICHARDSON, Individually; PORTER WILSON, Executive Director of Employees Retirement Systems of Texas, Defendants - Appellee
Summary: Case: 17-20192 Document: 00514494184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 17-20192 FILED May 31, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce DONNA K. HILTON, Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. STEVE MCCRAW, Director of Texas Department of Public Safety; ROBERT EARL PETTY, Individually; CHARLES ANTHONY RICHARDSON, Individually; PORTER WILSON, Executive Director of Employees Retirement Systems of Texas, Defendants - Appellees..
More
Case: 17-20192 Document: 00514494184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 17-20192 FILED
May 31, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
DONNA K. HILTON, Clerk
Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
STEVE MCCRAW, Director of Texas Department of Public Safety; ROBERT
EARL PETTY, Individually; CHARLES ANTHONY RICHARDSON,
Individually; PORTER WILSON, Executive Director of Employees
Retirement Systems of Texas,
Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CV-592
Before WIENER, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donna K. Hilton appeals the dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
claiming substantive and procedural due process violations for deprivation of
property based on the lack of spousal consent to the selection of her now-
deceased husband’s retirement plan. After consideration of the briefs, record,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-20192 Document: 00514494184 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2018
No. 17-20192
and applicable law in this matter, we conclude that the order of dismissal
should be affirmed, essentially for the reasons set out by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
2