Filed: Apr. 19, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20304 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR Galicia-Moreno, also know as Rolando Sanchez Martinez, also known as Rolands Martinez, also know as Rolando S. Martinez, also know as Edgar Moreno Galicia, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 19, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20304 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR Galicia-Moreno, also know as Rolando Sanchez Martinez, also known as Rolands Martinez, also know as Rolando S. Martinez, also know as Edgar Moreno Galicia, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of T..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 19, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-20304
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDGAR Galicia-Moreno,
also know as Rolando Sanchez Martinez,
also known as Rolands Martinez,
also know as Rolando S. Martinez,
also know as Edgar Moreno Galicia,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-182-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel, Thomas A. Martin, moves for leave
to withdraw and filed an Anders1 brief in support of his motion.
Galicia-Moreno did not file a response. After review both of
counsel’s brief and of the record, we conclude that no
*
Pursuant to the 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
nonfrivolous issues remain for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.2
2
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2