Tractor and Equipment Company v. Dual Trucking and, 17-30286 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 17-30286
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-30286 Document: 00514553810 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-30286 Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2018 TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. DUAL TRUCKING AND TRANSPORT, L.L.C.; ANTHONY ALFORD, Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:15-CV-5413 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEME
Summary: Case: 17-30286 Document: 00514553810 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-30286 Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2018 TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. DUAL TRUCKING AND TRANSPORT, L.L.C.; ANTHONY ALFORD, Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:15-CV-5413 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMEN..
More
Case: 17-30286 Document: 00514553810 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 17-30286 Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2018 TRACTOR AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff - Appellee v. DUAL TRUCKING AND TRANSPORT, L.L.C.; ANTHONY ALFORD, Defendants - Appellants Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:15-CV-5413 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* After reviewing the briefs and hearing oral argument from the parties, we AFFIRM the judgment essentially for the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
