Magdalena Eubank v. Lockhart Independent Sch Dist, 17-50604 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 17-50604
Visitors: 40
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-50604 Document: 00514596609 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-50604 August 13, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce MAGDALENA EUBANK, Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. LOCKHART INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CV-1019 Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This
Summary: Case: 17-50604 Document: 00514596609 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-50604 August 13, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce MAGDALENA EUBANK, Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. LOCKHART INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CV-1019 Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This i..
More
Case: 17-50604 Document: 00514596609 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-50604 August 13, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce MAGDALENA EUBANK, Clerk Plaintiff - Appellant v. LOCKHART INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15-CV-1019 Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This is an appeal of the district court’s grant of motions to compel, for sanctions, and for summary judgment in favor of Lockhart Independent School District in a disability discrimination and retaliation action. After consideration of the briefs, record and applicable law in this matter, we affirm for essentially the reasons set out by the district court. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
