Enedelia Rivas v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C., 17-41058 (2018)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 17-41058
Visitors: 26
Filed: Sep. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-41058 Document: 00514626251 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/04/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41058 September 4, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ENEDELIA RIVAS, Plaintiff - Appellant v. WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, L.L.C., Defendant – Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CV-224 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: Case: 17-41058 Document: 00514626251 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/04/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41058 September 4, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ENEDELIA RIVAS, Plaintiff - Appellant v. WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, L.L.C., Defendant – Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CV-224 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
Case: 17-41058 Document: 00514626251 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/04/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-41058 September 4, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ENEDELIA RIVAS, Plaintiff - Appellant v. WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, L.L.C., Defendant – Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16-CV-224 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * After reviewing the briefs, record, and relevant precedent, we AFFIRM the district court’s adoption of the magistrate’s report and recommendation essentially for the reasons set forth therein. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
