Case: 18-40201      Document: 00514684716         Page: 1    Date Filed: 10/16/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                    United States Court of Appeals
                                                                             Fifth Circuit
                                    No. 18-40201                           FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                October 16, 2018
                                                                      Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                  Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE ARMANDO ROJAS-ARRIAGA, also known as Jorge Rojas-Arriaga,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 2:17-CR-634-1


Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Armando
Rojas-Arriaga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States
v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Rojas-Arriaga has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein.     We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-40201   Document: 00514684716    Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/16/2018


                               No. 18-40201

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2