Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-10613 Document: 00514770212 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-10613 FILED Conference Calendar December 20, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ZARKO VIDIC, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-238-1 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Th
Summary: Case: 18-10613 Document: 00514770212 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-10613 FILED Conference Calendar December 20, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ZARKO VIDIC, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17-CR-238-1 Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The..
More
Case: 18-10613 Document: 00514770212 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 18-10613 FILED
Conference Calendar December 20, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ZARKO VIDIC,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:17-CR-238-1
Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Zarko Vidic has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Vidic has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-10613 Document: 00514770212 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2018
No. 18-10613
appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2