Case: 17-11286      Document: 00514769774         Page: 1    Date Filed: 12/20/2018




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                                                                     United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 17-11286
                                                                              Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                December 20, 2018
                                                                       Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                   Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

YASER MORENO, also known as Adrian Perez,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 3:16-CR-357-4


Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Yaser Moreno has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011).
Moreno has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 17-11286      Document: 00514769774   Page: 2   Date Filed: 12/20/2018


                                 No. 17-11286

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                       2