Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10214 Conference Calendar FRANCISCO B. LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, versus DAN JOSLIN, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Seagoville, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CV-2397 - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Franc
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-10214 Conference Calendar FRANCISCO B. LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, versus DAN JOSLIN, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Seagoville, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CV-2397 - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Franci..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-10214
Conference Calendar
FRANCISCO B. LOPEZ,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
DAN JOSLIN, Warden, Federal Correctional
Institute, Seagoville,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:04-CV-2397
--------------------
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Francisco B. Lopez, federal prisoner # 56053-079, appeals
the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in
which he challenged the way the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is
crediting the time he has served on a 72-month federal sentence
and a 240-month federal sentence. Lopez argues that the BOP
should back date the commencement of his 240-month sentence to
coincide with the date he began serving his 72-month sentence.
He contends that because the offenses are related, he can serve
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-10214
-2-
no more than the 240-month sentence imposed as a result of his
second conviction. He argues that by refusing to credit the time
he has served on his 72-month sentence toward the service of his
240-month sentence, his punishment for those offenses is being
illegally cumulated.
To the extent that Lopez attempts to raise claims cognizable
in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court was without
jurisdiction to entertain them. See § 2255. Accordingly, Lopez
is not entitled to relief based on those claims.
With regard to his remaining claims, Lopez has not shown
that the district court erred by denying his § 2241 petition.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(a) & (b). Accordingly, the judgment is
AFFIRMED.