Filed: Mar. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 17-11417 Document: 00514870982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-11417 March 13, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. RONALD CONNER, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CV-752 Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This appea
Summary: Case: 17-11417 Document: 00514870982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 17-11417 March 13, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. RONALD CONNER, Defendant - Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CV-752 Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This appeal..
More
Case: 17-11417 Document: 00514870982 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/13/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 17-11417 March 13, 2019
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
RONALD CONNER,
Defendant - Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CV-752
Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This appeal concerns the district court’s order holding Conner in
contempt. On February 4, 2019, we directed both parties to address whether
this case is moot in the light of the district court’s order vacating the contempt
order. In their responses to the court’s directive, both parties acknowledge that
the case is now moot. We agree. The district court vacated the contempt order
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 17-11417 Document: 00514870982 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/13/2019
No. 17-11417
and released Conner from custody—he is no longer suffering any injury or
limitation as a result of the contempt order, rendering the sole issue on appeal
moot. See Fontenot v. McCraw,
777 F.3d 741, 747 (5th Cir. 2015).
DISMISSED AS MOOT.
2