Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-50877 Document: 00514874739 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-50877 March 15, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARK ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:18-CR-572-1 Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CU
Summary: Case: 18-50877 Document: 00514874739 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-50877 March 15, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARK ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:18-CR-572-1 Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CUR..
More
Case: 18-50877 Document: 00514874739 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 18-50877 March 15, 2019
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARK ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:18-CR-572-1
Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Mark Anthony Rodriguez appeals from the order of the district court
denying his motion to revoke the magistrate judge’s pretrial detention order.
The denial of that motion was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v.
Rueben,
974 F.2d 580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Hare,
873 F.2d 796,
798 (5th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, the order of the district court is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.