Filed: Apr. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-40854 Document: 00514931272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-40854 FILED Conference Calendar April 25, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUCY MARQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 5:17-CR-447-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 18-40854 Document: 00514931272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-40854 FILED Conference Calendar April 25, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUCY MARQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 5:17-CR-447-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ..
More
Case: 18-40854 Document: 00514931272 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 18-40854 FILED
Conference Calendar April 25, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
LUCY MARQUEZ,
Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
No. 5:17-CR-447-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lucy Marquez has
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-40854 Document: 00514931272 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2019
No. 18-40854
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Marquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2