Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-10978 Document: 00514935921 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-10978 FILED April 30, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO VASQUEZ-CASO, also known as Mario Saul Marquez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-528-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and
Summary: Case: 18-10978 Document: 00514935921 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-10978 FILED April 30, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO VASQUEZ-CASO, also known as Mario Saul Marquez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17-CR-528-1 Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and S..
More
Case: 18-10978 Document: 00514935921 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 18-10978
FILED
April 30, 2019
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MARIO VASQUEZ-CASO, also known as Mario Saul Marquez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:17-CR-528-1
Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Mario Vasquez-Caso has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Vasquez-Caso has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-10978 Document: 00514935921 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/30/2019
No. 18-10978
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2