Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Trystan Napper, 18-10443 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 18-10443 Visitors: 24
Filed: May 10, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-10443 Document: 00514952913 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/10/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-10443 May 10, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. TRYSTAN KEUN NAPPER, also known as TruCat, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17-CR-61-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Ci
More
     Case: 18-10443      Document: 00514952913         Page: 1    Date Filed: 05/10/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                    No. 18-10443                              May 10, 2019
                                 Conference Calendar
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                  Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TRYSTAN KEUN NAPPER, also known as TruCat,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:17-CR-61-2


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
       The attorney appointed to represent Trystan Keun Napper has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
(5th
Cir. 2011). Napper has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 18-10443    Document: 00514952913    Page: 2   Date Filed: 05/10/2019


                                No. 18-10443

appellate review.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer