Case: 19-40029      Document: 00515043447         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/22/2019




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit


                                    No. 19-40029                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                      July 22, 2019
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR LUIS ALVAREZ-RIOS, also known as Oscar Alvarez-Romero, also
known as Ricardo Hinojosa,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 7:18-CR-1640-1


Before DENNIS, OWEN, and HO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar Luis Alvarez-
Rios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Alvarez-Rios has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-40029    Document: 00515043447    Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/22/2019


                                No. 19-40029

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2