Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 18-50957 Document: 00515073935 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-50957 FILED c/w No. 18-50958 August 13, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FERNANDO QUINTELA-GALINDO Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-488-3 USDC No. 4:18-CR-211-1 Before WIENER, HAY
Summary: Case: 18-50957 Document: 00515073935 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-50957 FILED c/w No. 18-50958 August 13, 2019 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. FERNANDO QUINTELA-GALINDO Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-488-3 USDC No. 4:18-CR-211-1 Before WIENER, HAYN..
More
Case: 18-50957 Document: 00515073935 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 18-50957 FILED
c/w No. 18-50958 August 13, 2019
Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
FERNANDO QUINTELA-GALINDO
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 4:13-CR-488-3
USDC No. 4:18-CR-211-1
Before WIENER, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Fernando Quintela-Galindo appeals the sentence imposed following the
revocation of his supervised release. He challenges the substantive
reasonableness of his 24-month term of imprisonment, which fell within the
range of the guidelines policy statement and which was ordered to run
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 18-50957 Document: 00515073935 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/13/2019
No. 18-50957
c/w No. 18-50958
consecutively with the sentence imposed for the new law violation of aiding
and abetting possession with intent to distribute marijuana.
Sentences imposed upon revocation of supervised release are reviewed
under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(4)’s “plainly unreasonable” standard, which is more
deferential than the reasonableness standard applicable to sentences imposed
upon conviction. See United States v. Warren,
720 F.3d 321, 326 (5th Cir.
2013). The district court heard Quintela-Galindo’s mitigating arguments and
concluded that a consecutive, within-guidelines sentence of 24 months was
appropriate. His arguments here amount to a disagreement with the district
court’s balancing of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and decision to
run the sentences consecutively. This court will not reweigh those factors. See
Gall v. United States,
552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Further, he cannot establish any
error in connection with the district court’s decision to impose consecutive
sentences. See United States v. Cotroneo,
89 F.3d 510, 512 (5th Cir. 1996); see
also U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f), p.s. Quintela-Galindo has not overcome the
presumption of reasonableness that applies. See United States v. Lopez-
Velasquez,
526 F.3d 804, 808-09 (5th Cir. 2008). The district court’s revocation
sentence is affirmed (No. 18-50957).
Although Quintela-Galindo appealed the judgment on the new law
violation, he raises no challenge to that conviction or sentence, citing the
appeal waiver in his plea agreement. Thus, the judgment underlying that
appeal (No. 18-50958) is likewise affirmed. Quintela-Galindo’s pro se motion
for appointment of new counsel which, on its face, is labeled “ex parte,” is
stricken for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 25(b)
and (d) requiring service of all filings and proof thereof. Alternatively, it is
denied as untimely. See United States v. Wagner,
158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th
Cir. 1998).
2
Case: 18-50957 Document: 00515073935 Page: 3 Date Filed: 08/13/2019
No. 18-50957
c/w No. 18-50958
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL STRICKEN.
3