Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Guevara, 05-41850 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-41850 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41850 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLAUDIO ROMERO GUEVARA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-1106-4 - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Claudio Romero Guevara appeals followin
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                    June 21, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 05-41850
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLAUDIO ROMERO GUEVARA,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 7:04-CR-1106-4
                       --------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Claudio Romero Guevara appeals following his guilty plea

conviction for possession with intent to distribute more than

1,000 kilograms of marijuana.    He argues that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is

unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).    Guevara

acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by this court’s

precedent, United States v. Slaughter, 
238 F.3d 580
, 582 (5th




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 05-41850
                                 -2-

Cir. 2000), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court

review.

     Guevara’s argument is foreclosed.     
Slaughter, 238 F.3d at 582
; see United States v. Fort, 
248 F.3d 475
, 482-83 (5th Cir.

2001).    Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer