Filed: Jul. 14, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-51300 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN CARLOS AVILA-MIRANDA, also known as Juan Carlos Miranda-Avila, also known Nelson Amaya Coca, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-83-ALL - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-51300 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN CARLOS AVILA-MIRANDA, also known as Juan Carlos Miranda-Avila, also known Nelson Amaya Coca, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-83-ALL - Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and D..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 13, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-51300 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN CARLOS AVILA-MIRANDA, also known
as Juan Carlos Miranda-Avila, also known
Nelson Amaya Coca,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CR-83-ALL
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos
Avila-Miranda raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-
Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held
that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a
separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.