Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Delgado, 05-11211 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-11211 Visitors: 72
Filed: Aug. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-11211 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SANDY DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-44-1 - Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represen
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 August 25, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 05-11211
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SANDY DELGADO,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 5:05-CR-44-1
                      --------------------

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Sandy

Delgado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).        Delgado

has not filed a response.     Our independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer