Filed: Oct. 05, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-51285 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO GONZALEZ-ORTIZ, also known as Frank Ortiz, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1178-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-51285 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FRANCISCO GONZALEZ-ORTIZ, also known as Frank Ortiz, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-1178-ALL - Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 5, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-51285
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FRANCISCO GONZALEZ-ORTIZ, also
known as Frank Ortiz,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 3:05-CR-1178-ALL
--------------------
Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco
Gonzalez-Ortiz raises arguments that are foreclosed by United
States v. Hinojosa-Lopez,
130 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir. 1997),
which held that a Texas felony conviction for possession of
marijuana was an “aggravated felony” under § 2L1.2(b) of the
Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.