Filed: Oct. 06, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 6, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30012 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FLOYD NELLUMS, JR., also known as David Winters, also known as Joseph Lewis, also known as Lattian Mouton, also known as Kevin McGahey, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS October 6, 2006 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30012 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FLOYD NELLUMS, JR., also known as David Winters, also known as Joseph Lewis, also known as Lattian Mouton, also known as Kevin McGahey, Defendant- Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
October 6, 2006
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-30012
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FLOYD NELLUMS, JR., also known as David Winters,
also known as Joseph Lewis, also known as
Lattian Mouton, also known as Kevin McGahey,
Defendant-
Appellant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:05-CR-20036-ALL
----------------------------------------------------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Floyd Nellums, Jr., has filed
a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Nellums
filed a response arguing that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary as to the amount of loss
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
used to enhance his sentence and that the district court clearly erred in enhancing his sentenced based
on that loss amount.
Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Nellums’s response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-2-