Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20732 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE MOLINA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-161-1 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jos
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20732 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE MOLINA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-161-1 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jose..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-20732
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE MOLINA-VASQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-161-1
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Molina-Vasquez has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molina-Vasquez has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and
counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.