Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Molina-Vasquez, 05-20732 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-20732 Visitors: 40
Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20732 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE MOLINA-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-161-1 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Jos
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  October 25, 2006

                                                             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk
                              No. 05-20732
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE MOLINA-VASQUEZ,

                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 4:05-CR-161-1
                         --------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Jose Molina-Vasquez has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).      Molina-Vasquez has

not filed a response.     Our independent review of the record and

counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer