Filed: Oct. 25, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-31001 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CURT SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:04-CR-10014-3 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed t
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-31001 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CURT SINGLETON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:04-CR-10014-3 - Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-31001 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CURT SINGLETON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 1:04-CR-10014-3
--------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent
Curt Singleton has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Singleton has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.