Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paul Edward Archie, Paul Edward Archie v. David A. Christian, 84-2175 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 84-2175 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 05, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 788 F.2d 1147 Paul Edward ARCHIE, et al., Plaintiffs, Paul Edward Archie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David A. CHRISTIAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 84-2175. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 5, 1986. Paul E. Archie, pro se. Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., M. Lawrence Wells, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Hugh Gibson, Judge.ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion August 19
More

788 F.2d 1147

Paul Edward ARCHIE, et al., Plaintiffs,
Paul Edward Archie, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David A. CHRISTIAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-2175.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 5, 1986.

Paul E. Archie, pro se.

Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., M. Lawrence Wells, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Hugh Gibson, Judge.ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 19, 1985, 5 Cir., 1985, 768 F.2d 726)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer