Oakville Commty Actn v. Industrial Pipe Inc, 05-30462 (2006)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 05-30462
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 13, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 13, 2006 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30462 _ OAKVILLE COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP; LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NETWORK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus INDUSTRIAL PIPE INC., Defendant-Appellee. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans No. 2:02-CV-1258 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Ju
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 13, 2006 _ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30462 _ OAKVILLE COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP; LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NETWORK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus INDUSTRIAL PIPE INC., Defendant-Appellee. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans No. 2:02-CV-1258 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Jud..
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 13, 2006 _______________________ Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-30462 _______________________ OAKVILLE COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP; LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION NETWORK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus INDUSTRIAL PIPE INC., Defendant-Appellee. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans No. 2:02-CV-1258 Before JONES, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court has carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and pertinent portions of the record in light of the parties’ excellent oral arguments. We conclude there is no reversible error in the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We therefore AFFIRM the final judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
