Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40742 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUDE NATHAN CHRISTIAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-2232-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jude Nathan Christian appeals the sen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40742 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUDE NATHAN CHRISTIAN, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-2232-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jude Nathan Christian appeals the sent..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40742
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUDE NATHAN CHRISTIAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:04-CR-2232-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jude Nathan Christian appeals the sentence imposed following
his guilty plea to transporting illegal aliens. Christian argues
that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the
collection of a DNA sample as a condition of his supervised
release. As Christian concedes, such a claim is not ripe for
review on direct appeal. See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,
428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed
(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Christian seeks to preserve the
issue for further review by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-40742
-2-
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See
id. at 1102.
APPEAL DISMISSED.