Filed: Jan. 04, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT January 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41453 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVEN DONALD KNEZEK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (5:90-CR-257–1) _ Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Represented by counsel, Steven Donald Knezek appeals the 21-
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT January 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41453 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVEN DONALD KNEZEK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (5:90-CR-257–1) _ Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:* Represented by counsel, Steven Donald Knezek appeals the 21- ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT January 4, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41453
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVEN DONALD KNEZEK,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(5:90-CR-257–1)
_________________________________________________________________
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:*
Represented by counsel, Steven Donald Knezek appeals the 21-
months term of supervised release imposed by the district court
when it revoked his second term of supervised release, contending
it is excessive by one month. Knezek fails, however, to provide
any legal authority for his assertion (other than citing to a
Guidelines handbook), cite the applicable standard of review, or
provide adequate supporting citations to the record. Accordingly,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
-2-
Knezek has inadequately briefed his claim and, therefore, has
effectively abandoned it. See Yohey v. Collins,
985 F.2d 222, 224-
25 (5th Cir. 1993); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9).
AFFIRMED