Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Salinas-Chavez, 05-41743 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-41743 Visitors: 45
Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41743 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN FIDENCIO SALINAS-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:05-CR-538-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Fidencio Salinas-Chavez ap
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 12, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 05-41743
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN FIDENCIO SALINAS-CHAVEZ,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 7:05-CR-538-ALL
                          --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Juan Fidencio Salinas-Chavez appeals his guilty-plea

conviction for unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b).     In his sole issue on appeal, Salinas-Chavez argues

that § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony

convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the

offense that must be found by a jury is unconstitutional in light

of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 05-41743
                                -2-

     Salinas-Chavez’s constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
523 U.S. 224
,

235 (1998).   Although Salinas-Chavez contends that Almendarez-

Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme

Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi, we

have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that

Almendarez-Torres remains binding.   See United States v. Garza-

Lopez, 
410 F.3d 268
, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 
126 S. Ct. 298
(2005).   Salinas-Chavez properly concedes that his argument is

foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent,

but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

     AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer