Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41762 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NARCISO HERNANDEZ-ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-383 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Na
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41762 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NARCISO HERNANDEZ-ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-383 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Nar..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41762
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NARCISO HERNANDEZ-ANTONIO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:04-CR-383
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Narciso Hernandez-
Antonio has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Hernandez-Antonio received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed
no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.