Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hernandez-Antonio, 05-41762 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-41762 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41762 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NARCISO HERNANDEZ-ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-383 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Na
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                             F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 12, 2006

                                                          Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                  Clerk
                            No. 05-41762
                        Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                    Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

NARCISO HERNANDEZ-ANTONIO,

                                    Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. 1:04-CR-383
                       --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Narciso Hernandez-

Antonio has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Hernandez-Antonio received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed

no response.   Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.   Counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.      See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer