Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41844 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-188-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repr
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41844 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESSE MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-188-ALL - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to repre..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41844
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JESSE MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:04-CR-188-ALL
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesse
Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Martinez has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent
review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and this APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-41844
-2-