Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Doporto, 05-50266 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-50266 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50266 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAFAEL MANUEL DOPORTO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1582-2 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Rafa
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 12, 2006

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 05-50266
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAFAEL MANUEL DOPORTO,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Texas
                      USDC No. 3:04-CR-1582-2
                        --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Rafael Manuel Doporto

has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Doporto has not

filed a response to counsel’s Anders motion.

     Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue.   Accordingly, the motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.       See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-50266
     -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer