Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Flores, 05-50531 (2006)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-50531 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 12, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT December 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-50531 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLOS FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-551-1 - Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Flore
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                December 12, 2006

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                    Clerk
                              No. 05-50531
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

CARLOS FLORES,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 5:03-CR-551-1
                       --------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Flores has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).      Flores received a

copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response.     Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issues for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.        See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer