Filed: Jan. 25, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-20611 Clerk Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE EPIFANIO DELAPORTILLA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-82-ALL - Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel on direct appeal has moved
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F I L E D FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-20611 Clerk Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE EPIFANIO DELAPORTILLA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-82-ALL - Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel on direct appeal has moved f..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
F I L E D
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 25, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-20611 Clerk
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE EPIFANIO DELAPORTILLA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-82-ALL
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel on direct appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.
Acquaye,
452 F.3d 380, 382 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent
review of counsel’s briefs, the record, and the appellant’s
responses discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.