Filed: Feb. 07, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20245 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISMAEL GALLEGOS-CORTEZ, also known as Ismael Gallegos Cortez, also known as Ismael Cortes Gallegos, also known as Ismae Gallegos, also known as Mario Alberto Cuellar, also known as Ismael Gallegos, also known as Ismael Gallegos-Cortes, Defendant-Appell
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20245 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISMAEL GALLEGOS-CORTEZ, also known as Ismael Gallegos Cortez, also known as Ismael Cortes Gallegos, also known as Ismae Gallegos, also known as Mario Alberto Cuellar, also known as Ismael Gallegos, also known as Ismael Gallegos-Cortes, Defendant-Appella..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 7, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 06-20245
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISMAEL GALLEGOS-CORTEZ, also known as Ismael Gallegos
Cortez, also known as Ismael Cortes Gallegos, also known as
Ismae Gallegos, also known as Mario Alberto Cuellar, also
known as Ismael Gallegos, also known as Ismael
Gallegos-Cortes,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:05-CR-411-1
--------------------
Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ismael Gallegos-
Cortez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres
v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate
criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance
is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.