Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-20660 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN ELLIOT JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-120-6 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-20660 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN ELLIOT JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CR-120-6 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent J..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-20660 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN ELLIOT JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:02-CR-120-6
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Jonathan Elliot Jackson has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jackson has filed a
response and moves for the appointment of new counsel. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Jackson’s
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2. The motion for appointment of new counsel is
DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.