Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Drake, 05-41051 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-41051 Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41051 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LYNN DRAKE, also known as Lynn Kennedy, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-93-1 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed co
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 February 14, 2007

                                                           Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                   Clerk
                             No. 05-41051
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LYNN DRAKE, also known as Lynn Kennedy,

                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Eastern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 4:04-CR-93-1
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Lynn Drake has moved for leave

to withdraw from representation and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).          Drake

has not filed a response.    Our independent review of the record

and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues

for appeal.    Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and this APPEAL IS DISMISSED.    See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.



     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer