Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41133 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAMEYON ANTOINE NEWTON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-152-1 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appoi
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-41133 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAMEYON ANTOINE NEWTON, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-152-1 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appoin..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-41133
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAMEYON ANTOINE NEWTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:04-CR-152-1
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dameyon
Antoine Newton has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Newton has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.