Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Hernandez-Flores, 05-41233 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 05-41233 Visitors: 37
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-41233 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OSCAR HERNANDEZ-FLORES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-343-ALL - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender ap
More
                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                Fifth Circuit
                                                              F I L E D
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                  February 14, 2007

                                                         Charles R. Fulbruge III
                              No. 05-41233                       Clerk
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR HERNANDEZ-FLORES,
                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 1:05-CR-343-ALL
                       --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar

Hernandez-Flores (Hernandez) on appeal has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Hernandez has not responded to

counsel’s motion.   Our independent review of the brief, the

supplemental letter brief, and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue in this appeal.    Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.        See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer