Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-41329 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GILBERTO BERMUDEZ-OLIVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-383 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender ap
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-41329 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GILBERTO BERMUDEZ-OLIVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-383 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender app..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 05-41329 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GILBERTO BERMUDEZ-OLIVAREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:99-CR-383
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilberto
Bermudez-Olivarez (Bermudez) has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Bermudez has not filed a response to counsel’s
motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.